Surplus to requirements, the Windrush ‘row’!
Recently, there have been a number of articles and news
bulletins about individuals from the Commonwealth who were brought to the UK
from the late 1940s to 1970s as children with their parents who are now being
told that they are illegal immigrants 40, 50 and even 60 years after they
entered the country.
The first set of immigrants who came to the UK were over 500
people from Jamaica who arrived on the Windrush
in June 1948, they answered to a number of job adverts encouraging them to come
to the UK to help restore the British infrastructure that was destroyed during
World War 2. The Conservative government
at the time encouraged people from the West Indies to immigrate to the UK under
the British
Nationality Act 1948, which gave all Commonwealth citizens’ free entry into
Britain. This resulted in mass
immigration from a number of countries within the commonwealth such as Jamaica,
Barbados, Antigua, Trinidad and Tobago and Dominica.
These immigrants took up a number of job roles within the
NHS, London Transport, British Rail, Post Office as well as manual roles such
as cleaning, factory workers etc. They
came to the UK with their children, forsaking their homelands in the hope of
building a better future for themselves, their children and future generations
with some hoping to return back to their mother land to settle in retirement.
During these years both parents and children experienced
racism, starting with landlords refusing to rent them accommodation, discrimination
in the workplace, schools, streets and in particularly with the police. This resulted in numerous riots such as Notting Hill in
1958 and Brixton in the 1980s.
Their children were formally accepted into the country and
were given full access to schools, NHS, employment and public funds. Many have contributed to the British society
and have paid into the system through paying tax; national insurance and have
even built their own business and employed others. They have established themselves and have
integrated into British society, with some getting married and starting their
own families, even buying their own homes. Throughout the years the government
have changed their immigration law and as a consequence the initial British
Nationality Act of 1948 whereby they had free entry to Britain their rights to
remain status have evaporated into thin air whereby the Immigration Act 1971
removed all rights to remain in the UK for all Commonwealth citizens who
entered the UK after this date. It is
believed that one of the factors that led to Margaret Thatcher becoming Prime
Minister in 1979 was that she had identified the concerns of the white British
citizens concerns of increasing immigrants.
In 1981 her government passed the British Nationality Act which defined
that those born in Britain, their children or grandchildren were acknowledged
as british citizens. This law changed
encouraged a number of individuals to confirm their nationality, however there
was still a large number who did not. Many did not realise that the constant
changes to the UK’s immigration laws over the years would affect them because 1)
when they left their homeland they were still under British rule and considered
themselves to be British 2) they practically lived their entire life in the UK,
still able to work and access public services.
Recently there have been a number of reporting’s and
campaigns highlighting the plight of a number of individuals who have been told
they need to return to their ‘country’ that they have left behind as
children. This has affected Michael
Braithwaite, Albert
Thompson, Antony
Bryan, Glenda Caesar, Paulette
Wilson and others
who have or are still fighting the Home Office to remain in the UK, and as a
consequence some have lost their homes, jobs or refused access to services such
as welfare benefits and the NHS (which may I add, their parents came to this
country to fill the gaps of the nursing shortage some 50 plus years ago).
The question which now remains unanswered is how much people
from the Windrush generation during the late 1940s to early 1970s are going
through this today? It has been
estimated that there are approximately 50,000 Commonwealth immigrants who could
be affected by the new 'hostile
environment' immigration policy which came into force in 2013. Recently publicity has showed that this is a
far bigger problem than first anticipated and the number of individuals coming
forward seeking help is rapidly increasing.
This has raised awareness with 12 Caribbean Commonwealth Heads of State
who requested a meeting with the Prime Minister to discuss a resolution whilst
they attend the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), which will be
hosted in the UK between 16 – 20 April 2018.
However, this was initially declined by the Prime Minister, but due to the increasing backlash of lack of
remorse and cold posterior, plus a signed letter from 140 MPs across the
various political parties Theresa May has miraculously changed her mind.
As time goes on and the more exposure received, it is
apparent that the longest serving former Home Secretary (whom is now our Prime
Minister) and who is responsible for the enforcement of these tighter
immigration policies including the removal of the protection rights to the
Windrush Commonwealth immigrants is detached and non sympathetic to these
individuals. It is suggested that the
Caribbean Commonwealth members are more severely affected by these tight
immigration rules and have been asked to jump through excessive hoops to
produce more documentations or proof of the length of time they have resided in
the UK than any other Commonwealth or recent EU immigration members.
The Home Office are aware that there are a number of
residents who have had the right to remain in UK during the Windrush period,
but due to poor administration they themselves do not hold sufficient records,
if any. Since the increasing pressure
and publicity of this despicable act the Home Office have published guidelines
on 13 April 2018 to individuals who may be affected by this change of law. The recent flurry of movements that have
taken place, have now added further questions which will now need to be
answered by the government, such as how much people have been deported since
this law came into effect? Immigration
Minister Caroline Nokes openly admitted that the mishandling of this policy has
resulted in a number of people being deported to back to their origin of
birth. Unfortunately, she was unable to
confirm the number and there was no mention whether their status would be
reinstated in order for them to return to the UK.
In a move to resolve this matter, the Home Office have announced
that they will be making urgent amendments to the policy, but not only do they
need to reinstate the protection rights to the Windrush immigrants they will
also need to address how they will compensate these individuals for the loss of
income, stress, homes, health care and jobs they have lossed as a consequence. There is a petition and Project Windrush GoFundMe
to assist with outreach work which is currently in circulation which has asked
for the Home Office to give an amnesty to all Windrush minors who resided in
the UK from 1948 – 1971. So far they
have obtained over 100,000 signatures and an urgent parliamentary question will
be raised by David Lammy, Tottenham MP regarding this issue. Please do not let this stop you from signing
the petition, the more signatures attained the more chances the topic will be
discussed properly and sufficient help and support is given to individuals rather
than this being swept under the carpet.
June 2018, it will be 70 years since the first set of
Windrush immigrants entered the UK. Like
it or not, they have shaped and made the UK into what it is today. They came in good faith, relocated their
families, and were upstanding members within communities, worked hard and made sacrifices
for Great Britain. This law is a
dishonour to the history, the hard work and memories of these Commonwealth parents
and their children. Their rights and
quality of living in the UK are being threatened to be revoked with the Home
Office trying to banish them to a country that they no longer recognise as
their home because in this governments eyes they are now surplus to requirements.
If ethnic minority people ever wondered whether the Conservative party truly cares about them as individuals, a race or a community this should be a moment for them to open your eyes - they don’t! It is evident that had this not spiralled out of her control, Theresa May would happily ignore the impact that this callous act has impeded on the Windrush generation.
A very well articulated version of the current status quo but also yet another glaring opportunity to see how we as a community are really considered. Let's stand together to effect positive change.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree. This situation has been going undetected and has effected a number of people within the community. I am glad it is getting the attention it deserves and I am extremely proud of the efforts of David Lammy MP for standing behind and the community.
DeleteThank you I enjoyed that read that gave us nothing but he facts. It's just a shame that almost a year later the issue still exists!
ReplyDeleteThank you. It’s terrible that this is still happening even though the government have not resolved the issues from the Windrush scandal last year.
DeleteUnfortunately, it goes to show we can’t whole heartedly trust the government and that their actions will need to speak louder than their words.